CallCentreVoice Topic Benchmarking

Created by:
Statistics:
Forum:
Quick links:

ingrid christophersen on 28/11/2006 12:09:58.
Topic has 3 posts; viewed 827 times.
General   [This topic is read only]
Forum List | Unified View | Latest Posts
Popular Topics | Editor's Choice | Voices WebLog

Author

Comments

ingrid christophersen
business manager
square systems

15 posts
0 friends welcomed

Benchmarking  [28/11/2006 12:09:58]

Hi everyone
As a new member I am still finding my way around the forum, but haven't seen much on Benchmarking as yet. We are considering setting up a FREE benchmarking service (covering the metrics detailed below) and it would be really helpful to know whether you people would consider this useful. Our (draft) comparators are:
1.Average wait to answer
2.Longest wait to answer
3.Average time to abandon
4.Longest wait to abandon
5.% Abandoned calls
6.% First Call Resolution (ie.resolved by agent who handles initial contact)
7.Average time to respond to email
8.Customer satisfaction levels - as measured by the Question “would you recommend this service to a friend” where this data is available.

What do you all think? - Useful or not? - Covered by others? - Anything missing if not? I'd be v grateful for your combined wise replies.

Gold Level MemberYou don't have the priviledges to view this user's post history

 

Dave Appleby
Resource Analyst
Healthcare Insurance

1435 posts
0 friends welcomed

Benchmarking (comments)  [28/11/2006 14:32:26]



Hi Ingrid and welcome to CCV.

Just a couple of points.

Whilst I thouroughly agree benchmarking is a useful tool
for overall performance management. I would like, if I may.
To make a few comments / observations on the metrics you've
chosen.


1.Average wait to answer

Always a good one to start with, however, how do you benchmark
between different companies in different industries.

I'm going to hazzard a guess you'll just go for an overall industry average.


2.Longest wait to answer

I'm not sure this one is applicable, longwaits are atypical in the overall
ANS Time grouping. normally (provided you're at least attempting to
staff correctly), the call ASA will fall into a statistically normal Poisson
distribution. Therefore the longests ASA falls outside the
normal deviation being right at the upper limit.


3.Average time to abandon

Personal opinion time. This is a VERY good one everyone should watch. It needs
to take into accout both ABA before / during a delivered message and post
message pre agent delivery ABA times. It's normally a good indicator your
IVR script is too long / convolouted.

4.Longest wait to abandon

Again I'll stand by my comments on longest time to answer above.


5.% Abandoned calls

NOrmally a good benchmark and target. Again as long as it's not at the
cost of quality. Remeber to model using 1-2 more FTE.
Watch the service level go up for very little CAPEX {he he he...}


6.% First Call Resolution (ie.resolved by agent who handles initial contact)

Again probably trade dependant


7.Average time to respond to email

Again probably trade dependant

8.Customer satisfaction levels - as measured by the Question “would you recommend
this service to a friend” where this data is available.


Yes, yes, yes... AND LISTEN TO THE RESULTS PEOPLE!



Ok,

That looks a bit negative but....

It only is if you look at the industry (CC Here) as a whole. When
you start looking at the individual trade areas, then break them down into
specifics the befefits start to show.

so. Finance > Banking, Insurance Sales, Insuance claims (both split
even more by type)

Then you'll start seeing the patterns develop within the specific trade groups.

Was this what you intended?

Hope this helps a bit.

If I can help further give me a shout.

Regards

DaveA


Gold Level MemberYou don't have the priviledges to view this user's post history

 

ingrid christophersen
business manager
square systems

15 posts
0 friends welcomed

Current benchmarking services  [5/12/2006 11:08:02]

Thanks very much for the detailed feedback Dave. We may consider going ahead with a scaled-down version in due course, taking your comments which I completely accept into account.

If anyone has any comments as to the state of play of benchmarking - do you use it - if so who provides your benchmarking - is it useful - is there anything missing - and does it cost you? Then feedback would be most welcome!

Gold Level MemberYou don't have the priviledges to view this user's post history

 
  

In Read Only View, you cannot reply to any topic