Hi All,
This is my first ever topic and am new to the forum, so please be gentle! If this question has already been asked i'd be grateful if someone could point me in the right direction.
We've recently opened ourselves up to the minefield that is Interval forecast accuracy without thinking about what good forecasting looks like first.
Historically we've always used forecast calls by interval against total calls offered to get an accuacy figure. That's never been a problem at either daily, weekly or monthly levels as we're normally within a 5% variance. However because interval calls can vary anywhere between 30 calls and 400 calls per interval being 2 calls out on a 30 call forecast shows roughly a 7% variance and because we didn't think about the how this should be reported, this is being reported as red on our RAG (Red Amber Green) report. My argument is that this isn't a bad forecast and that the measurements are wrong.
I want to move to a sliding scale of accuracy based on the expected calls per interval and I wondered if anyone had any advice on the subject and what scale to use?
Thanks all,
Dale. |